Skip to main content
· 9/10/1986

Katz v. Pierce

Citations

  • 732 P.2d 92
  • 41 Utah Adv. Rep. 12
  • 1986 Utah LEXIS 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts should be indulgent toward vacating default judgments where the defaulted party demonstrates a reasonable justification or excuse for failing to answer
  • holding that the court would not consider-on appeal from the district court's denial of appellants' rule 60(b) motion-a new challenge to the district court's award of damages in excess of the amount prayed for because appellants did not raise the issue in their rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.