D. Kansas· 2/7/2002
Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.
Citations
- 196 F. Supp. 2d 1062
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2298
- 2002 WL 221410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that evidence is admissible only if RR is greater than 2.0
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vratil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2004-02-04· cited 153×
- King v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ry. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-02-27· cited 132×
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-03-14· cited 53×
- In Re Viagra Products Liability LitigationD. Minnesota· 2008-04-02· cited 23×
- Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.First Circuit· 2012-05-02· cited 22×
- In re Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Products Liability LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-06-27· cited 21×
- Blanchard v. Eli Lilly & Co.D. Vermont· 2002-03-29· cited 20×
- Vanderwerf Ex Rel. Vanderwerf v. SmithKlineBeecham Corp.D. Kansas· 2008-01-09· cited 7×
- In re Celexa & Lexapro Products Liability LitigationE.D. Missouri· 2013-03-04· cited 2×
- Hidalgo County, Texas v. Dora Herrera, Individually, and as Representative of the Estate of Reynaldo Herrera, Eric Herrera, Efren Herrera, Michael Herrera, Jessica Herrera Rodriguez, Celia Herrera, Vanessa Herrera, Veronica Herrera Rodriguez Herrera, and Rey HerreraTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-08-24
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Katie Bonner, Esau Bonner v. Isp Technologies, Inc., Crawford & Company, Inc., MovantEighth Circuit· 2001-08-03· cited 339×
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2001-12-26· cited 310×
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,525 Juan Jaurequi v. Carter Manufacturing Co., Inc., John Deere Company Deere & CompanyEighth Circuit· 1999-04-06· cited 201×
- Alcatel Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dgi Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1999-01-29· cited 189×
- In Re Breast Implant LitigationD. Colorado· 1998-06-03· cited 84×
- Magistrini v. One Hour Martinizing Dry CleaningD. New Jersey· 2002-01-04· cited 53×
- Darla J. Bourelle and Rhonda Wendling v. Crown Equipment CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2000-07-17· cited 48×
- Wade-Greaux Ex Rel. Greaux v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc.Virgin Islands· 1994-03-03· cited 46×
- Siharath v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.N.D. Georgia· 2001-03-01· cited 46×
- United States v. Samuel T. Taylor, United States of America v. Samuel T. TaylorSeventh Circuit· 1998-08-26· cited 37×
- Pick v. American Medical Systems, Inc.E.D. Louisiana· 1997-02-27· cited 34×
- Milanowicz v. Raymond Corp.D. New Jersey· 2001-07-12· cited 32×
- Brasher v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.N.D. Alabama· 2001-09-21· cited 18×
- In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.D. Kansas· 2000-02-16· cited 17×
- Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.D. Kansas· 2001-11-01· cited 17×
- Spellman v. HopperM.D. Alabama· 1999-10-01· cited 12×
- Roberts v. BowersoxE.D. Missouri· 1999-08-06· cited 5×
- Ruff v. Ensign-Bickford Industries, Inc.D. Utah· 2001-08-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.