Skip to main content
· 2/16/2000

In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.

Citations

  • 85 F. Supp. 2d 1130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the expert's declaration was not contradictory and \[a]t best\ reflected \speculation\ on the expert's part
  • excluding an expert declaration that was disclosed after the scheduling order's deadline because, “[a]lthough the decision to exclude evidence is a drastic sanction, plaintiff must abide by the same rules as other litigants”
  • “While White involved sanctions under Rule 11, its principles apply equally to sanctions under Rules 26 and 37.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vratil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.