· 2/16/2000
In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.
Citations
- 85 F. Supp. 2d 1130
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the expert's declaration was not contradictory and \[a]t best\ reflected \speculation\ on the expert's part
- excluding an expert declaration that was disclosed after the scheduling order's deadline because, “[a]lthough the decision to exclude evidence is a drastic sanction, plaintiff must abide by the same rules as other litigants”
- “While White involved sanctions under Rule 11, its principles apply equally to sanctions under Rules 26 and 37.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vratil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.