Wade-Greaux Ex Rel. Greaux v. Whitehall Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ADEs and case reports “represent anecdotal information of chance associations” and “do not purport to assess cause and effect”
• potential expert excluded as their only knowledge or experience on area came from “review, for purposes of testifying in litigation, of selected literature”
• court “concluding] that the theory of plaintiffs expert witnesses that they can directly extrapolate from experimental animal studies without supportive positive human studies to opine as to causation in humans is one that has an extraordinarily high rate of error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).