Katie Bonner, Esau Bonner v. Isp Technologies, Inc., Crawford & Company, Inc., Movant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if a judge believes there are better grounds for some alternative conclusions, if there are good grounds for an expert's conclusion, it should be admitted
• indicating that in some circumstances a temporal link is, alone, evidence of causation
• noting the general rule and finding the expert’s subsequent reliance on case reports in addition to other facts reliable
• affirming jury award in toxic tort case where “the immediacy of [plaintiff’s] acute symptoms to her exposure” was sufficient to establish causation
• affirming jury award in toxic tort case where “the immediacy of [plaintiff’s] acute symptoms to her exposure” was sufficient to establish causation
• rejecting a defendant’s argument that an expert’s testimony regarding causation should be excluded because it was “not yet established as fact in the scientific community.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).