Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Heil (In Re Heil)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the omission of assets and obligation owed to debtor by third- party warranted revocation of discharge
• knowledge that a statement is false can be proven by demonstrating that the debtor knew the truth, but failed to provide the information or provided contradictory information
• ‘Revocation of a debtor’s discharge is an extraordinary remedy, so § 727(d) is liberally construed in favor of the debtor and strictly construed against the party seeking revocation.”’
• revocation is an extraordinary remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).