Halverson v. Funaro (In Re Frank Funaro, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 9011 requires the court to find that specific procedural requirements have been met
• holding that Rule 9011 requires the court to find that specific procedural requirements have been met
• “[A] corporation’s right to use, benefit from, or revoke its Subchapter S status falls within the broad definition of property [under the Code].”
• “The Rule thus imposes a continuing duty on the plaintiff to dismiss a cause of action if he learns, or has reason to learn that he will not be able to offer evidence sufficient to sustain his burden”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).