Skip to main content
· 11/27/1996

State Bank of India v. Kaliana (In Re Kaliana)

Citations

  • 202 B.R. 600
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1497
  • 1996 WL 683092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • If the creditor could have known of the alleged fraud, it has an affirmative duty to so investigate before the discharge is granted or the court will dismiss the requested revocation.”
  • creditor’s investigation “was neither diligent nor timely”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John H. Squires

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.