· 7/30/2015
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility
Citations
- 795 F.3d 1024
- 116 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13275
- 2015 WL 4568613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the 18 law of the case doctrine does not apply if “the evidence on remand is substantially 19 different”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Wallace, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.