Skip to main content
· 7/30/2015

Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility

Citations

  • 795 F.3d 1024
  • 116 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13275
  • 2015 WL 4568613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the 18 law of the case doctrine does not apply if “the evidence on remand is substantially 19 different”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Wallace, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.