Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under a similar rule, FRCP 53, consolidation does not merge discrete actions into a single cause of action
• holding that a district court cannot acquire subject matter jurisdiction over an improperly removed case through consolidation
• holding that a district court cannot acquire subject matter jurisdiction over an improperly removed case through consolidation
• holding that collateral attack can be successful only where and to the extent that it discloses want of power as distinguished from error in exercise of power
• holding that collateral, attack can be successful only where and to the extent that it discloses want of power as distinguished from error in exercise of power
• holding consolidation does not \make those who are parties in one suit parties in another\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).