Third Circuit· 5/4/1971
Michael J. Burke v. Gateway Clipper, Inc
Citations
- 441 F.2d 946
- 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10385
- 1971 A.M.C. 1623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff's burden is to present facts which, as a matter of law, would estop defendant from asserting statute of limitations
- plaintiffs burden is to present facts which, as a matter of law, would estop defendant from asserting statute of limitations
- when the analogous statute of limitations has run, this Court “requires the plaintiff to come forward and prove that his delay was excusable”
- injured seaman was not misled into delaying lawsuit where he was never told to not file suit and captain of the vessel only informed him that he would not receive compensation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Freedman, Murrah, Per Curiam, Van Dusen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rita Patricia Keefe v. Bahama Cruise Line, Inc., a Foreign CorporationEleventh Circuit· 1989-03-15· cited 333×
- Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1980-08-05· cited 232×
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.First Circuit· 1985-03-21· cited 229×
- Robert T. McGregor v. Louisiana State University Board of SupervisorsFifth Circuit· 1993-09-24· cited 208×
- Charles Clauson v. Robert D. SmithFirst Circuit· 1987-07-17· cited 182×
- Robert Bomba and Annamarie P. Bomba v. W. L. Belvidere, Inc., a General Partner Doing Business as Candlewick Lakes Associates, a PartnershipSeventh Circuit· 1978-07-21· cited 112×
- University of Pittsburgh, a Non Profit Corporation v. Champion Products Inc., a CorporationThird Circuit· 1982-12-13· cited 111×
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. the GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, AppelleeThird Circuit· 1984-05-18· cited 110×
- Arthur D. OTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDLAND-ROSS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1975-10-01· cited 102×
- Leo A. Lukenas and Geraldine R. Lukenas, Etc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Bryce's Mountain Resort, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1976-06-30· cited 70×
- Anaconda Co. v. Metric Tool & Die Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-02-12· cited 68×
- Gruca v. United States Steel Corp.Third Circuit· 1974-04-17· cited 67×
- Michael Churma v. United States Steel CorporationThird Circuit· 1975-04-04· cited 52×
- Real v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-01-13· cited 42×
- Sanchez v. Loffland Brothers CompanyFifth Circuit· 1980-10-01· cited 39×
- John M. Atkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Ninth Circuit· 1982-08-31· cited 27×
- Francis v. Pan American Trinidad Oil CompanyD. Delaware· 1975-05-01· cited 26×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1978-08-24· cited 20×
- Melhorn v. Amrep CorporationM.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-04-19· cited 19×
- Santana Products Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.Third Circuit· 2005-02-09· cited 19×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 563×
- Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court· 1951-11-05· cited 295×
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 287×
- Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoFourth Circuit· 1949-12-03· cited 109×
- Loverich v. Warner Co.Third Circuit· 1941-03-17· cited 104×
- Demetrios Larios v. Victory Carriers, Inc., and Alexander S. Onassis Corp., and Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc., and Cia, Salaminia De Naviera S.A.Second Circuit· 1963-04-17· cited 102×
- Kane v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsThird Circuit· 1951-06-21· cited 68×
- Mroz v. Dravo Corp.Third Circuit· 1970-07-27· cited 61×
- Wrightsman Petroleum Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1941-05-26· cited 52×
- Season-All Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Turkiye Sise Ve Cam Fabrikalari, A.S., a Corporation, and Seaply Glass Corporation, a CorporationThird Circuit· 1970-04-22· cited 47×
- Marvin E. Lipfird v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, a CorporationThird Circuit· 1962-12-06· cited 23×
- Rocco D. Longo v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, New York Central SystemThird Circuit· 1966-01-03· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.