· 6/4/1979
Arthur D. OTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDLAND-ROSS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 600 F.2d 24
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14275
- 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9269
- 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Dice relied on in finding jury trial right on waiver issue in ADEA case
- tolling in ADEA suits is question of fact for jury
- tolling in ADEA suits is question of fact for jury
- “[W]e hold that Ott was at least entitled to the full amount of time allowed by Congress for the commencement of his action, undiminished by any period of time in which it might 17 Actions § 386, at 693–94 (2000
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weick, Engel, Merritt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.