Skip to main content
· 6/4/1979

Arthur D. OTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDLAND-ROSS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 600 F.2d 24
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14275
  • 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9269
  • 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Dice relied on in finding jury trial right on waiver issue in ADEA case
  • tolling in ADEA suits is question of fact for jury
  • tolling in ADEA suits is question of fact for jury
  • “[W]e hold that Ott was at least entitled to the full amount of time allowed by Congress for the commencement of his action, undiminished by any period of time in which it might 17 Actions § 386, at 693–94 (2000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weick, Engel, Merritt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.