Real v. Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, as a matter of law, a 10-month period of time was sufficient to file suit
• fraudulent concealment claim rejected where decedent was alerted to the possibility of alleged malpractice ten months before the running of the period of limitations
• an action under Act could not be maintained where, on date of his death, patient would have been barred from bringing action on acts which reportedly caused his death
• fraudulent concealment claim rejected where decedent was alerted to the possibility of alleged malpractice ten months before the running of the period of limitations
• once decedent was diagnosed with brain cancer, he was put on inquiry that the defendant health care providers might have misdiagnosed him three years earlier, and as a result “he then had the burden of investigating whether he had a cause of action for medical malpractice”
• once decedent was diagnosed with brain cancer, he was put on inquiry that the defendant health care providers might have misdiagnosed him three years earlier, and as a result “he then had the burden of investigating whether he had a cause of action for medical malpractice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).