Skip to main content
· 4/4/1975

Michael Churma v. United States Steel Corporation

Citations

  • 514 F.2d 589
  • 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether the district court has utilized the correct legal principles is freely reviewable by this court . . . .”
  • “Prior to the running of the statute, the defendant has to prove laches, but thereafter the plaintiff has to disprove laches.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Dusen, Gibbons, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.