Skip to main content
· 11/26/2013

Collins v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Citations

  • 407 U.S. App. D.C. 201
  • 736 F.3d 521
  • 2013 WL 6169572
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering “(1) the essence of the crime and its relation to other criminal activity; (2) whether the defendant fit into the class of persons for whom the statute was principally designed; (3) the maximum sentence and fine that could have been imposed; and (4
  • affirm- ing $310,000 fine for violating section 15(b) of the Exchange Act against an Excessive Fines Clause challenge
  • “A penalty that is not far out of line with similar penalties imposed on others and that generally meets the statutory objectives seems highly unlikely to qualify as excessive in constitutional terms.”
  • “A civil penalty violates the Excessive Fines Clause [of the Eighth Amendment] if it ‘is grossly disproportional to the gravity of the offense.” (quoting United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 334, 118 S.Ct. 2028, 141 L.Ed.2d 314 (1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kavanaugh, Williams, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.