Edward Spreitzer v. James M. Schomig, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a prisoner must actually “brief’ the issue in question
• recognizing \fair presentment\ and \futility\ as exceptions to the exhaustion doctrine
• “Under pre-AEDPA law, if a petitioner has failed to adequately develop material facts in previous state court proceedings, we again apply the ‘cause and prejudice’ standard to determine whether an No. 02-2838 23 evidentiary hearing is warranted.”
• discussing exhaustion of habeas claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).