E.D. Missouri· 4/13/2017
Deck v. Steele
Citations
- 249 F. Supp. 3d 991
- 2017 WL 1355437
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56638
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Prejudice cannot be found on speculation alone.”
- rejecting the same argument raised here
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
207 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 8,719×
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 7,499×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,124×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.