Skip to main content

Mendoza v. State

Citations

  • 130 P.3d 176
  • 122 Nev. 267
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 23
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that such increases in risks of danger support dual convictions for robbery and kidnapping
  • holding that such increases in risks of danger support dual convictions for robbery and kidnapping
  • explaining, in a kidnapping-robbery context, that defendant may be convicted of both first-degree kidnapping and an associated offense SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 6 (0
  • setting forth parameters under which dual convictions for robbery and kidnapping arising from the same court of conduct may be sustained
  • prohibiting convictions for both kidnapping and an associated offense when the kidnapping is purely incidental to the other offense
  • stating that written or oral statement of waiver of right to remain silent unnecessary but waiver of right may be inferred from actions and words of 'Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ea accused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Rose, Becker, Gibbons, Douglas, Hardesty, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.