Nevada Supreme Court· 10/20/2005
Carter v. State
Citations
- 121 P.3d 592
- 121 Nev. 759
- 121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 75
- 2005 Nev. LEXIS 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an immediate admonition to the jury can cure the prejudice created by a witness's reference to inadmissible subject matter
- holding that the defense elicited the bad act testimony and was “estopped from raising any objection on appeal”
- holding that the defense elicited the bad act testimony and was \estopped from raising any objection on appeal\
- holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving flight instruction at sexual assault trial where defendant asserted that charged sexual acts were consensual
- holding that evidence that defendant “concealed himself under a pile of clothes in his apartment” while defendant’s wife misled police about his whereabouts “supported the [flight] instruction”
- indicating that an objection to the admission of evidence is timely if made when the evidence is introduced for admission
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maupin, Becker, Rose, Gibbons, Douglas, Hardesty, Parraguirre
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 230×
- Rose v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2007-07-26· cited 154×
- Mendoza v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-03-16· cited 101×
- Grey v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 74×
- Rodriguez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2012-04-05· cited 62×
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-08-02· cited 59×
- Ledbetter v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-03-16· cited 55×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-20· cited 52×
- Davidson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-10-02· cited 19×
- State v. GodeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-08-13· cited 1×
- Starr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Nevada· 2018-11-21· cited 1×
- Sanchez-Dominguez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2014-02-27
- Guitron v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2015-05-21
- RIPPO (MICHAEL) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-PC)Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-08-02
- FARMER (STEVEN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2017-11-16
- RIPPO (MICHAEL) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-PC)Nevada Supreme Court· 2016-02-25
- GONZALEZ (ERNESTO) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2015-12-31
- RIMER (STANLEY) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2015-06-11
- GUITRON (MIGUEL) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2015-05-21
- STARR (BRANDON) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2018-11-21
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-11-25· cited 453×
- Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 230×
- Petrocelli v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1985-01-04· cited 199×
- United States v. Ralph G. FaganFifth Circuit· 1987-08-10· cited 115×
- Tavares v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2001-09-17· cited 101×
- Tinch v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 70×
- United States v. Aida Gonzales-Benitez, United States of America v. Ambrosio Hernandez-CoronelNinth Circuit· 1976-06-02· cited 63×
- McKenna v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 56×
- Hutchins v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-02-04· cited 52×
- Runion v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-12-04· cited 42×
- Sterling v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1992-07-02· cited 38×
- Qualls v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-09-02· cited 33×
- Jones v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1979-09-27· cited 33×
- Margetts v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1991-09-30· cited 20×
- Stroup v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-05-19· cited 6×
- Honeycutt v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-10-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.