Nevada Supreme Court· 6/23/2005

Garcia v. State

Citations

113 P.3d 836
121 Nev. 327
121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 33
2005 Nev. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that absent objection, this court reviews instruction error for plain error
concluding that the district court's inquiry, albeit limited, was adequate where \[the defendant's] attorney addressed the court on the motion [to substitute counsel] and agreed to resolve the issues in due course\
noting that the jury may not consider the penalty when deciding guilt
noting that sufficient cause would be “a complete collapse of the attorney-client relationship”
noting that sufficient cause would be \a complete collapse of the attorney-client relationship\
affirming convictions for kidnapping, robbery, and conspiracy based on events occurring close together in time and within the same room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Gibbons, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.