Medina v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limitation provisions in section 41 have a legitimate State purpose and are not unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rognant v. Palacios
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-31· cited 25×
• Niziolek v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-12· cited 22×
• Sanders v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-30· cited 19×
• Segarra v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-23· cited 5×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Towns v. Yellow Cab Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-10-06· cited 231×
• People Ex Rel. Cason v. Ring
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 97×
• Maloney v. Bower
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-09-17· cited 72×
• King v. Johnson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-12-04· cited 59×
• Fujimura v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 46×
• Mitsuuchi v. City of Chicago
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-12-15· cited 32×
• Schuman v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1950-11-27· cited 30×
• Muscare v. Voltz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-07-12· cited 24×
• Penkava v. Kasbohm
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-06-29· cited 22×
• Aldridge v. Fox
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1952-10-14· cited 21×
• Mitsuuchi v. City of Chicago
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-12-11· cited 2×