Niziolek v. Chicago Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no cases under the Tort Immunity Act or the Transit Act excusing a complete failure to give notice to the proper parties within the required time period
• finding no cases under the Tort Immunity Act or the Transit Act excusing a complete failure to give notice to the proper parties within the required time period
• finding no cases under the Tort Immunity Act or the Transit Act excusing a complete failure to give notice to the proper parties within the required time period
• section 41 applied to plaintiff driving his auto when allegedly struck by a CTA bus
• case dismissed for improper service despite plaintiff's argument that CTA was not harmed or prejudiced by the error
• section 41 applied to plaintiff driving his auto when allegedly struck by a CTA bus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).