Sanders v. Chicago Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissal required where secretary not served despite plaintiffs argument that “a strict construction of the Act would be inequitable”
• case dismissed for improper service despite plaintiff's argument that strict construction of section 41 would be \inequitable\
• case dismissed for improper service despite plaintiffs argument that strict construction of section 41 would be “inequitable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).