Skip to main content
· 12/31/1991

Rognant v. Palacios

Citations

  • 586 N.E.2d 686
  • 224 Ill. App. 3d 418
  • 166 Ill. Dec. 728
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 2215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant could raise his affirmative defense in a motion for summary judgment where “plaintiff had adequate time to respond to defendant’s assertion of the statute of limitations”
  • finding no waiver where the affirmative defense “was pled properly in defendant’s motion for summary judgment”
  • finding no waiver where the affirmative defense \was pled properly in defendant's motion for summary judgment\
  • finding no waiver where the affirmative defense \was pled properly in defendant's motion for summary judgment\
  • though party seeking to amend answer to include affirmative defense of statute of limitations waited almost three years after suit filed, opposing party did not suffer prejudice because it had adequate time to respond to this defense
  • though party seeking to amend answer to include affirmative defense of statute of limitations waited almost three years after suit filed, opposing party did not suffer prejudice because had adequate time to respond to this defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.