Mitsuuchi v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing, in the context of a negligence suit by a police officer against a fellow officer, that the “statutory mechanism” at work in sections 22— 306 and 22 — 307 of the Pension Code is “similar” to the Workers’ Compensation Act
• observing, in the context of a negligence suit by a police officer against a fellow officer, that the “statutory mechanism” at work in sections 22–306 and 22–307 of the Pension Code is “similar” to the Workers’ Compensation Act
• payment made to officer injured in the line of duty was “pursuant to” section 22-306 of the Pension Code notwithstanding that section’s permissive language
• payment made to officer injured in the line of duty was “pursuant to” section 22-306 of the Pension Code notwithstanding that section’s permissive language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).