Skip to main content

Medina v. State

Citations

  • 418 P.3d 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that AS 12.55.027 “sets out criteria for determining whether a defendant’s time in treatment qualifies for jail credit”
  • “Thus, probation violations are not new ‘offenses,’ separate and independent from one another and from the underlying criminal conviction. Rather, probation revocations relate back to the underlying criminal offense[.]”
  • “[P]robation revocations relate back to the underlying criminal offense, constituting ‘continuing punishment for the crime for which probation was originally imposed.’” (quoting Demientieff v. State, 814 P.2d 745, 747 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mannheimer, Allard, Wollenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.