Skip to main content

Paul v. State

Citations

  • 560 P.2d 754
  • 1977 Alas. LEXIS 557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining due process requirements apply to both parole and probation revocations
  • there is no difference between parole and probation revocations as regards due process require- . ments
  • no requirement of credit for unsuccessful probationary period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Burke, Connor, Erwin, Rabi-Nowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.