Skip to main content

Wells v. State

Citations

  • 706 P.2d 711
  • 1985 Alas. App. LEXIS 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the legislature did not intend application of mandatory consecutive sentencing to turn on \such fortuitous and haphazard considerations\ as whether a defendant had the foresight to arrange consolidated sentencing proceedings
  • holding that the legislature did not intend application of mandatory consecutive sentencing to turn on “such fortuitous and haphazard considerations” as whether a defendant had the foresight to arrange consolidated sentencing proceedings
  • “It is well established that, in accordance with the rule of lenity, ambiguities in penal statutes must be resolved in favor of the accused.”
  • “It is well established that, in accordance with the rule of lenity, ambiguities in penal statutes must be resolved in favor of the accused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.