Toney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, when imposing a defendant’s suspended sentence, the sentencing court must consider “all available sentencing evidence” in light of the Chaney criteria (citing State v. Chaney, 477 P.2d 441, 443-44 (Alaska 1970))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Medina v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-03-02· cited 30×
• Avalanche Industries, Inc. v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2009-01-20· cited 13×
• State v. Henry
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2010-10-08· cited 9×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-10-20· cited 5×
• Yearby v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-03-23· cited 3×
• Jeter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-02-17· cited 2×
• Robert Joel Mollica II v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-10-22· cited 1×
• Evenson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-05-12· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Chaney
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1970-12-07· cited 600×
• McClain v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-03-15· cited 593×
• Luepke v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-12-23· cited 16×
• Witt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-09-26· cited 13×
• Gilbert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-27· cited 8×
• Crouse v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-05-08· cited 8×