Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Arkansas· 4/16/1998

McQuay v. Guntharp

Citations

  • 963 S.W.2d 583
  • 331 Ark. 466
  • 1998 Ark. LEXIS 222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to reach merits of whether Medical Malpractice Act’s two-year limitations period applied to outrage claim against a physician — appellant failed to obtain a ruling on this issue at the trial court level
  • considering whether the facts in a complaint stated a claim for outrage or battery
  • finding a claim for outrage “separate and apart” from a claim for battery
  • “[The Supreme Court of Arkansas] gives a narrow view to the tort of outrage . . . .”
  • physician had inappropriately touched, examined, and fondled patients’ breasts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbin, Banks, Newbern, Imber, Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named McQuay v. Guntharp

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.