Slaton v. Slaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that late entry of new trial order was void for lack of jurisdiction
• holding that a trial court loses jurisdiction to set aside or modify an order pursuant to Rule 60(b), if it fails to take such action more than ninety days after entering the order
• reversing and remanding because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to rule on a posttrial motion
• when appellant asserted the defense of res judicata, but failed to obtain a ruling from the chancellor on the issue, this court refused to consider the issue on appeal
• “[W]e have held that a trial court loses jurisdiction to set aside or modify an order pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 60(b) if it does not do so within ninety days of the entrance of the original order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).