Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 4/22/1999

McPherson v. Coombe

Citations

  • 174 F.3d 276
  • 1999 WL 235771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding reversible error in granting a motion for summary judgment against a pro se litigant where neither the moving party nor the district court notified the pro se litigant of the requirements of Rule 56
  • a pro se party’s pleadings should be construed liberally and interpreted “to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest”
  • a pro se party’s pleadings should be construed liberally and interpreted “to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest”
  • a pro se party’s pleadings should be construed liberally and interpreted “to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest” (quoting Burgos v. Hopkins, 14 F.3d 787, 790 (2d Cir. 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Sack, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.