Sixth Circuit· 9/6/2017
Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson
Citations
- 870 F.3d 494
- 2017 FED App. 0207P
- 2017 WL 3881973
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 17174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that asking “adult members of the public” to “ris[e] and remain[] quiet in a reverent position” was not coercive
- noting that the nonmoving party \has an affirmative duty to direct the court's attention to those specific portions of the record upon which it seeks to rely to create a genuine issue of material fact\
- noting that the county’s “prayer policy permits prayers of any—or no—faith”
- rejecting “granular view of legislative prayer”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole, Batchelder, Moore, Clay, Gibbons, Rogers, Sutton, Cook, McKeague, Griffin, Kethledge, White, Stranch, Donald, Thapar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.