· 2/19/1999
Coleman Vital v. Interfaith Medical Center and Local 1199
Citations
- 168 F.3d 615
- 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1255
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2588
- 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,889
- 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 281
- 1999 WL 76804
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the failure of the district court to apprise a pro se litigant of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment is a ground for reversal
- holding that the failure of the district court to apprise a pro se litigant of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment is a ground for reversal
- holding that the failure of the district court to apprise a pro se litigant of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment is a ground for reversal
- holding that the failure of the district court to apprise a pro se litigant of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment is a ground for reversal
- holding that the failure of the district court to apprise a pro se litigant of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment is a ground for reversal
- holding that the failure of the district court to apprise a pro se litigant of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment is a ground for reversal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Straub, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.