Haas v. Commerce Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[F]ailure to oppose a 12(b)(6) motion cannot itself justify dismissal of a complaint.” (citing McCall v. Pataki, 232 F.3d 321, 322 (2d Cir. 2000) (explaining that “a failure to respond to a 12(c
• “In deciding an unopposed motion to dismiss, a court is to assume the truth of a pleading’s factual allegations and test only its legal sufficiency[.]” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting McCall, 232 F.3d at 322)
• “In deciding an unopposed motion to dismiss, a court is to ‘assume the truth of a pleading’s factual allegations and test only its legal sufficiency[.]’” (quoting McCall v. Pataki, 232 F.3d 321, 322 (2d Cir. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).