Estella Timms v. Anthony M. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pro se litigant is entitled to notice of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion for summary judgment
• requiring that pro se litigants opposing summary-judgment motion receive notice with consequences of inadequate response
• requiring that pro se litigants opposing summary-judgment motion receive notice with consequences of inadequate response
• reasoning that “it is difficult to say that the difference was more likely than not the result of intentional discrimination when two different decision-makers are involved”
• engaging in harmless error analysis and holding that pro se litigant is not entitled to relief if pro se cannot prove any set of facts in support of claim entitling claimant to relief
• requiring notice to pro se plaintiff of failure to properly respond to a summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).