Sixth Circuit· 9/10/1990
McMillan v. Parrott
Citations
- 913 F.2d 310
- 1990 WL 127956
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a divorce settlement may not waive a beneficiary’s pension plan benefits, as the plan administrator is only to consider the designation on file
- “The waiver provision in Barbara Parrott’s divorce settlement, however emphatic, does not specifically refer to her interest as beneficiary of these ERISA plans.”
- Congress intended ERISA plans to be uniform in their interpretation and simple in their application
- “The designation of beneficiaries plainly relates to these ERISA plans, and we see no reason to apply state law on this issue.”
- “This clear statutory command, together with the plan provisions, answer the question; the documents control. . . .”
- state law governing whether a waiver in a divorce settlement relinquished former spouse’s right to receive policy’s death benefits involves the designation of beneficiaries and therefore “relates to” an ERISA plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Guy, Keith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Todd v. AIG Life Ins. Co.Fifth Circuit· 1995-03-29· cited 155×
- Shelby County Health Care Corporation v. Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health and Welfare Trust Fund,defendant-Appellant, Tracy MasonSixth Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 148×
- David T. Hunter (99-3620) Robert Allison (99-3623) v. Caliber System, Inc., F/k/a Roadway Services, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2000-08-02· cited 142×
- Barnett v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 141×
- Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. William Jackson Adams, Iv, Rosita L. AdamsFourth Circuit· 1994-07-27· cited 128×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 1997-07-15· cited 109×
- Beatrice Hinds Carland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyTenth Circuit· 1991-06-21· cited 102×
- Willie Lee Tinsley v. General Motors Corporation Metropolitan Life, Beulah Calloway, Third-PartyThird Circuit· 2000-09-26· cited 69×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 1996-06-07· cited 68×
- Strong v. Omaha Construction Industry Pension PlanNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-06-24· cited 65×
- Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23944l Rosemary Riordan v. Commonwealth Edison CompanySeventh Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 64×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Richard E. Hanslip, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Louis Hanslip, Deceased, Ardith McCoolTenth Circuit· 1991-07-16· cited 59×
- Mattei v. MatteiSixth Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 49×
- Mcmillan v. ParrottSixth Circuit· 1990-09-10· cited 40×
- MacInnes v. MacInnesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-04-02· cited 35×
- Lynd v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceFifth Circuit· 1996-09-03· cited 32×
- James M. McGowan Sr. v. Njr Service Corporation New Jersey Natural Gas CompanyThird Circuit· 2005-09-13· cited 26×
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. HowellSixth Circuit· 2000-09-25· cited 24×
- Estate of Altobelli v. International Business MacHines Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1996-03-20· cited 23×
- Keen v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 22×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 3,550×
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 3,459×
- Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund v. Laurine Brown (Lamar), and Dessie Brown, and All UnknownSeventh Circuit· 1990-03-09· cited 169×
- Whitworth Bros. Storage Company v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, DefendantsSixth Circuit· 1986-08-26· cited 100×
- Lyman Lumber Company v. E. John Hill, Cassie Hill and Seth HillEighth Circuit· 1989-06-14· cited 71×
Other cases named McMillan v. Parrott
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.