Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 9/10/1990

McMillan v. Parrott

Citations

  • 913 F.2d 310
  • 1990 WL 127956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a divorce settlement may not waive a beneficiary’s pension plan benefits, as the plan administrator is only to consider the designation on file
  • “The waiver provision in Barbara Parrott’s divorce settlement, however emphatic, does not specifically refer to her interest as beneficiary of these ERISA plans.”
  • Congress intended ERISA plans to be uniform in their interpretation and simple in their application
  • “The designation of beneficiaries plainly relates to these ERISA plans, and we see no reason to apply state law on this issue.”
  • “This clear statutory command, together with the plan provisions, answer the question; the documents control. . . .”
  • state law governing whether a waiver in a divorce settlement relinquished former spouse’s right to receive policy’s death benefits involves the designation of beneficiaries and therefore “relates to” an ERISA plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Guy, Keith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named McMillan v. Parrott

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.