Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the question of an interpleader claimant’s standing is irrelevant to determine whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over an interpleader action
• holding that with respect to children, custodial parent’s address is sufficient
• noting that “when an insurance company administers claims for an employee welfare benefit plan and has the authority to grant or deny the claims, the company is an ERISA ‘fiduciary’ under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(iii)”; internal quotation marks omitted; emphasis added
• ERISA fiduciary “filed a complaint of interpleader” and the district court “dismissed [the fiduciary] after [it] deposited . . . the proceeds . . ., plus interest, with the clerk of the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).