Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23944l Rosemary Riordan v. Commonwealth Edison Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judgment against an employer is appropriate when that employer is sufficiently intertwined with the plan
• judgment against employer appropriate where “the exact relationship between [the employer] and the plan is not clearly set out”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).