Skip to main content
· 6/16/2008

Elder v. Astrue

Citations

  • 529 F.3d 408
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12687
  • 2008 WL 2406256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the ALJ’s decision must be affirmed even if “‘reasonable minds could differ’” as long as “the decision is adequately supported”
  • holding that the ALJ’s decision must be affirmed even if “‘reasonable minds could differ’” as long as “the decision is adequately supported”
  • holding that the ALJ’s decision must be affirmed even if “‘reasonable minds could differ’” as long as “the decision is adequately supported”
  • holding that the ALJ’s decision must be affirmed even if “‘reasonable minds could differ’” as long as “the decision is adequately supported”
  • holding that the ALJ’s decision must be affirmed even if “reasonable minds could differ’” as long as “the decision is adequately supported”
  • holding that the ALJ’s decision must be affirmed even if “‘reasonable minds could differ’” as long as “the decision is adequately supported”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.