McKenzie v. Advance Stores Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff was bound by the clear terms of the Summary Plan Description even though he never received a copy of it, and his employer had made express representations regarding coverage that were contrary to the provisions of the Summary Plan Description
• distinguishing Bartlett where prior SPD remained in effect despite change in insurers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).