Callery v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if ERISA-estoppel was a viable claim in the Tenth Circuit, it would be limited to “egregious cases” in which there is evidence of “lies, fraud or an intent to deceive”
• noting in both Mertens and Great-West1 the Supreme Court rejected claims for equitable relief under section 502(a)(3) where relief sought by plaintiffs to impose personal liability for a contractual obligation to pay money was legal rather than equitable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).