Moore v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that communications speaking of \lifetime\ benefits \at no cost\ do not \constitute the kind of misleading behavior\ that overrides the plan documents' explicit reservation clause
• holding that employer's failure to include modification clause in one summary booklet did not defeat such right
• holding that communications speaking of “lifetime” benefits “at no cost” do not “constitute the kind of misleading behavior” that overrides the plan documents’ explicit reservation clause
• holding that vesting would \decrease protection for future employees and retirees\
• holding that vesting would “decrease protection for future employees and retirees”
• noting that \unstable variables prevent accurate predictions of future needs and costs\ involved in employee welfare benefit plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).