Taft Broadcasting Company v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding nothing unjust about refusing to entertain plaintiff’s argument regarding the discovery date of loss when plaintiff did not contest the issue below
• “In the interests of judicial economy, an appellate court will generally not review issues that were not addressed to the forum below.”
• “[T]he standards upon which the court evaluates the motions for summary judgment do not change simply because the parties present cross-motions.”
• “[T]he standards upon which the court evaluates the motions for summary judgment do not change simply because the parties present cross-motions.”
• “As a rule, this court declines to entertain arguments not presented in the first instance to the district court.”(quoting Meador v. Cabinet for Human Resources, 902 F.2d 474, 477 (6th Cir. 1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).