Skip to main content
D. Utah· 5/25/1994

Mcewen v. Digitran Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 155 F.R.D. 678
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7845
  • 1994 WL 248469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “materials produced by an accountant in anticipation of litigation and under the direction of an attorney are protected by work product immunity”
  • Counsel’s retained accountants prepared the documents primarily to enable the re-issuance of the corporation’s financial statements despite pending litigation and SEC investigation
  • “The work product doctrine protects material prepared by agents for the attorneys as well as those prepared by the attorney for himself.”
  • applying primary motivating purpose test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mcewen v. Digitran Systems, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.