D. Utah· 5/25/1994
Mcewen v. Digitran Systems, Inc.
Citations
- 155 F.R.D. 678
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7845
- 1994 WL 248469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “materials produced by an accountant in anticipation of litigation and under the direction of an attorney are protected by work product immunity”
- Counsel’s retained accountants prepared the documents primarily to enable the re-issuance of the corporation’s financial statements despite pending litigation and SEC investigation
- “The work product doctrine protects material prepared by agents for the attorneys as well as those prepared by the attorney for himself.”
- applying primary motivating purpose test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greene
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.D. New Hampshire· 1996-03-11· cited 65×
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-12-21· cited 37×
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Automated Geographic Reference CenterUtah Supreme Court· 2008-12-23· cited 29×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2006-01-25· cited 24×
- In re Om Group Securities LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2005-02-28· cited 22×
- Aull v. Cavalcade Pension PlanD. Colorado· 1998-04-23· cited 19×
- UNITED STATES ex rel. [REDACTED] v. [REDACTED]D. Utah· 2001-04-23· cited 18×
- In re Raytheon Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2003-11-25· cited 14×
- Quinn v. InghamD. Colorado· 1997-12-09· cited 9×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- United States v. DavisFifth Circuit· 1981-02-12· cited 293×
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square BankTenth Circuit· 1985-02-06· cited 108×
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaSecond Circuit· 1979-05-21· cited 56×
- United States v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals· 1985-03-29· cited 52×
- Gottlieb v. WilesD. Colorado· 1992-02-11· cited 39×
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert Sutton v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1981-09-08· cited 25×
- Cunningham v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceS.D. California· 1994-03-14· cited 16×
- In re International Systems & Controls Corp. Securities LitigationS.D. Texas· 1981-09-25· cited 13×
- Fine v. United States Department of Energy, Office of Inspector GeneralD. New Mexico· 1993-03-29· cited 10×
Other cases named Mcewen v. Digitran Systems, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.