· 12/31/1997
Aull v. Cavalcade Pension Plan
Citations
- 988 F. Supp. 1360
- 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2752
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20729
- 1997 WL 797094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting plaintiffs’ argument that defendant could still cure the breach today and therefore the statute of limitations had not yet run
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daniel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.