In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert Sutton v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “to hold that a second subpoena is required would simply result in a complete waste of judicial time” and limiting the holding in Loubriel to subpoenas calling for testimony before a grand jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).