Skip to main content
· 2/6/1985

Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square Bank

Citations

  • 748 F.2d 540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a blanket, non-specific attorney-client and work product privilege objection was insufficient and effected a waiver of the privilege
  • holding that a blanket, non- specific attorney-client and work product privilege objection was insufficient
  • holding that a blanket, non-specific attorney-client and work product privilege objection was insufficient
  • refusing to issue writ of mandamus to district court where untimeliness of privilege-holder’s objection destroyed the attorney-client privilege
  • “A party seeking to assert a privilege must make a clear showing that it applies.”
  • “A party seeking to assert a privilege must make a clear showing that it applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett, McKay, Logan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.