· 2/6/1985
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square Bank
Citations
- 748 F.2d 540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a blanket, non-specific attorney-client and work product privilege objection was insufficient and effected a waiver of the privilege
- holding that a blanket, non- specific attorney-client and work product privilege objection was insufficient
- holding that a blanket, non-specific attorney-client and work product privilege objection was insufficient
- refusing to issue writ of mandamus to district court where untimeliness of privilege-holder’s objection destroyed the attorney-client privilege
- “A party seeking to assert a privilege must make a clear showing that it applies.”
- “A party seeking to assert a privilege must make a clear showing that it applies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barrett, McKay, Logan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.