Skip to main content

Whatley v. State

Citations

  • 509 S.E.2d 45
  • 270 Ga. 296
  • 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 4114
  • 1998 Ga. LEXIS 1217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecution’s “were they lying” questions were permissible because they “merely emphasized the conflict in the evidence, which it was the jury’s duty to resolve”
  • noting that a juror should be disqualified if he or she cannot set aside a prior opinion and decide the case based on the evidence and the trial court's charge and noting the trial court's discretion in deciding this matter
  • finding such questions merely emphasize the conflict in the evidence and do not improperly invade the role of the jury
  • noting that a juror should be disqualified if he or she cannot set aside a prior opinion and decide the case based on the evidence and the trial court’s charge and noting the trial court’s discretion in deciding this matter
  • where defendant did not move to strike prospective jurors for cause, trial court did not err by failing to excuse jurors sua sponte
  • “All aspects of a defendant’s crime, character, and attitude . . . [are] admissible in the sentencing phase.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears, Hunstein, Carley, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.