Eleventh Circuit· 2/7/1994

Mccabe v. Sharrett

Citations

12 F.3d 1558
1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1904
63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,828

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a plaintiffs First Amendment intimate association claims failed under any of three possible analytical approaches to intimate association retaliation claims
concluding that a transfer to another posi- tion was an adverse action where the plaintiﬀ lost some “eligibility for salary increases” although “her salary ha[d] not decreased”
holding that an employee suffered an adverse employment action when she was transferred to a job with less responsibility, more menial tasks, and less eligibility for salary raises
concluding that a plaintiff employee established an adverse action on summary judgment based on the employer police chief “transferring her from her job as secretary to the police chief to a less desirable job”
discussing the Pickering balancing test in the context of the right to free speech
“‘The right of expressive association . . . is protected by the First Amendment as a necessary corollary of the rights that the amendment protects by its terms.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.